<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House to Approve Bill without Voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaeltorbert.com/politics/house-to-approve-bill-without-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaeltorbert.com/politics/house-to-approve-bill-without-voting/</link>
	<description>WordPress Virtuoso</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Dole</title>
		<link>http://michaeltorbert.com/politics/house-to-approve-bill-without-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-46535</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Dole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeltorbert.com/?p=674#comment-46535</guid>
		<description>Look at how many times Bush used presidential signing statements to push something through:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signing_statement#Presidential_usage

I don&#039;t see any posts on your blog that address that topic, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at how many times Bush used presidential signing statements to push something through:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signing_statement#Presidential_usage" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signing_statement#Presidential_usage</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any posts on your blog that address that topic, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Torbert</title>
		<link>http://michaeltorbert.com/politics/house-to-approve-bill-without-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-9553</link>
		<dc:creator>David Torbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeltorbert.com/?p=674#comment-9553</guid>
		<description>In response to Bananenblatt, in America, it&#039;s illegal for hospitals to turn away someone needing critical or emergency care because of an ability to pay or a lack thereof.

Though we have some number of &quot;uninsured&quot;, that&#039;s not the same as not having access to healthcare.  The &quot;uninsured&quot; number includes those people who are temporarily between jobs (eg, you leave one job for another, but have a week in between the two), as well as people who could afford it if it were a priority, but, for one reason or another, choose not to have health insurance.  But in any event, everyone has access to some level of &quot;health care&quot;, even if they do not have access to &quot;health insurance&quot;.

That isn&#039;t to say that there aren&#039;t some people who are left out - there are, specifically those who have sleazy insurance carriers that drop them as soon as they get sick - but the crisis is exaggerated.

More important than whether or not there is a crisis and whether or not this particular proposal is a good idea or a bad idea is that the far left in this country wants to pass it without a vote and they want to bribe two senators in order to do it.  Regardless of whether or not you agree with the proposal, this is clearly wrong and criminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Bananenblatt, in America, it&#8217;s illegal for hospitals to turn away someone needing critical or emergency care because of an ability to pay or a lack thereof.</p>
<p>Though we have some number of &#8220;uninsured&#8221;, that&#8217;s not the same as not having access to healthcare.  The &#8220;uninsured&#8221; number includes those people who are temporarily between jobs (eg, you leave one job for another, but have a week in between the two), as well as people who could afford it if it were a priority, but, for one reason or another, choose not to have health insurance.  But in any event, everyone has access to some level of &#8220;health care&#8221;, even if they do not have access to &#8220;health insurance&#8221;.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t to say that there aren&#8217;t some people who are left out &#8211; there are, specifically those who have sleazy insurance carriers that drop them as soon as they get sick &#8211; but the crisis is exaggerated.</p>
<p>More important than whether or not there is a crisis and whether or not this particular proposal is a good idea or a bad idea is that the far left in this country wants to pass it without a vote and they want to bribe two senators in order to do it.  Regardless of whether or not you agree with the proposal, this is clearly wrong and criminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banana Leaf (German: "Bananenblatt")</title>
		<link>http://michaeltorbert.com/politics/house-to-approve-bill-without-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-9459</link>
		<dc:creator>Banana Leaf (German: "Bananenblatt")</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeltorbert.com/?p=674#comment-9459</guid>
		<description>Hi,
being German, I&#039;d claim to be neutral to this kind of US internal politics. But I do care for the health of people everywhere.

In the spirit of an informed discussion, I&#039;d like to object to the statement &quot;Our [The US] health care system is the best in the world.&quot; 
The US healthcare &lt;em&gt;industry&lt;/em&gt; is world leading, yes. But the health care &lt;em&gt;coverage&lt;/em&gt; of US citizens is almost Third-World (words from a German newspaper). Too few people can afford even the basics, too many left behind.

In Europe, everybody has a right to get his medical treatments paid. Not all of it, not every treatment conceivable, but everything that&#039;s needed to survive plus a chunk - details vary from country to country. 

In the US, what&#039;s the number of people who are ovwhelmed by health care cost is &lt;em&gt;huge&lt;/em&gt;. Yes, that comes at a cost: There is mandatory health care insurance. The freedom to not insure yourself is taken away. As diseases are as certain as death and taxes, I find that fair.

My reference is several high-paid IT specialists who migrated from the US to Germany a few years ago because the social network here in Germany is superior, and despite some erosion I believe it still is.

Don&#039;t have yourself scared by your own politicians. As Michael wrote: &quot;Research it on your own&quot;. Please also look for the international comparison for which fraction of the population can afford treatment. US media may be biased. Look into international sources. 

Best Regards,

Bananenblatt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
being German, I&#8217;d claim to be neutral to this kind of US internal politics. But I do care for the health of people everywhere.</p>
<p>In the spirit of an informed discussion, I&#8217;d like to object to the statement &#8220;Our [The US] health care system is the best in the world.&#8221;<br />
The US healthcare <em>industry</em> is world leading, yes. But the health care <em>coverage</em> of US citizens is almost Third-World (words from a German newspaper). Too few people can afford even the basics, too many left behind.</p>
<p>In Europe, everybody has a right to get his medical treatments paid. Not all of it, not every treatment conceivable, but everything that&#8217;s needed to survive plus a chunk &#8211; details vary from country to country. </p>
<p>In the US, what&#8217;s the number of people who are ovwhelmed by health care cost is <em>huge</em>. Yes, that comes at a cost: There is mandatory health care insurance. The freedom to not insure yourself is taken away. As diseases are as certain as death and taxes, I find that fair.</p>
<p>My reference is several high-paid IT specialists who migrated from the US to Germany a few years ago because the social network here in Germany is superior, and despite some erosion I believe it still is.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t have yourself scared by your own politicians. As Michael wrote: &#8220;Research it on your own&#8221;. Please also look for the international comparison for which fraction of the population can afford treatment. US media may be biased. Look into international sources. </p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Bananenblatt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

